What we can expect from Congress in 2007
(Article originally published by WFC Resources, December 2006, as an UpDate Column)
From the Wall Street Journal to the Washington Post, from blogs
to BusinessWeek, no one hesitates to stick their neck out and predict
what will come of the Democrats' victory in Congress. We, on the other hand, do
hesitate. So instead, we took a close look at about 15 different journals, news
magazines and other print media and are reporting here what the general
consensus is about legislation that may impact the work-life arena if it becomes
reality.
A boost in the federal minimum wage
While all observers assure us that there's no way the Dems can keep all those
electioneering promises, no one doubts the chances for a new minimum wage. Nancy
Pelosi promises a raise of $2.10 an hour, from the current $5.15 to $7.25, will
happen within the first 100 hours (some quotes say the first 24) and a national
poll by the National Council for Research on Women (NCRW) found Americans
overwhelmingly believe it's time; both men (63%) and women (72%) were more
likely to vote for a candidate who supported the raise. (While Missouri and five
other states recently voted to boost their wages above the federal minimum, the
Kansas law — untouched since 1988 — sets the lowest minimum of the 43 states
that bothered to pass such laws. In Kansas, the hourly wage, $2.65, can’t buy a
gallon of milk.
Executive pay and income inequality
Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) says he'll make income inequality his focus this
year (one Frank quote: "An average CEO makes more before lunch on his first day
of work than a minimum-wage earner will make all year.") Fed Chair Ben Bernanke
and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson have joined other prominent Republicans in
warning about the risks of the growing inequality, so some measures are likely
to pass. But there may be gridlock here, since conservatives will only favor
those measures that help low- and middle-income workers and leave the rich to
get richer, and Democrats' most likely target of the war on inequality will be
the wealthy, says The Wall Street Journal (11-21-06). They'll want cuts
rolled back and taxes raised on dividends and capital gains.
WSJ predicts that Frank will reintroduce legislation calling for greater
disclosure by companies about their "golden parachute" retirement packages,
similar to a bill last year that had 33 co-sponsors. It's too early, say
insiders, to speculate on this measure's fate.
Several believe strengthening unions will help, and one idea that has strong
support among Democrats is a change to the current rule that calls for a secret
ballot to approve a union. Democrats and labor leaders want employers to
recognize a union after most workers sign a card asking for representation.
Enlarging the earned-income tax credit is another likely option; it may get
support from both sides since it would reward low-wage and middle-income workers
without raising employers' costs.
The Washington Post reports that Democrats will make "fixing" the alternative
minimum tax a top priority this year, and a White House spokesman says that's
also a priority for the Bush Administration. The alternative minimum tax is
about 40 years old, an extra tax some have to pay on top of the regular income
tax. The original idea was to prevent people with very high incomes from using
special tax benefits to pay little or no tax, but for various reasons the AMT
reaches more people each year, including some people who don't have very high
incomes. Getting rid of the tax altogether would cost more than $1 trillion over
the next decade, and experts doubt that Democrats can find a way to do it.
Both parties are inching toward similar proposals on retirement savings, says
the WSJ. One proposal would be a universal 401(k) to which employees, employers
and in some cases, government, would contribute. It would narrow future
inequality by encouraging Americans to save more in their working years.
Paid sick leave
Voters passed a law in San Francisco this November giving employees one hour
of sick leave for every 30 hours worked in a week after three months of
probation. The National Partnership for Women & Families and several
activist groups in San Francisco will work hard to get Congress to do the same.
Proponents claim the measure will be good for business, but San Francisco's
Chamber of Commerce led the unsuccessful fight against it, and business groups
nationwide will join the battle if Congress begins to consider it. We give it a
slim-to-none chance this year, even though 61% of women (including 48% of
Republican women) and 46% of men told the NCRW they would be more likely to
support a candidate for Congress who supported paid sick leave for all workers.
Extend FMLA
An HJ Cummins column in the Minneapolis Star Tribune (11-10-06) suggests
several items that might have a chance. One of them is extending the Family and
Medical Leave Act to workplaces of 25 or more instead of the current 50. Another
is the possibility of providing funding for demonstration projects like
Minnesota's "At-Home Infant Child Care Program," which helps families with
children under one to cover some of the costs of a parent staying home to care
for the infant. Similar pilots are underway in Montana and New Mexico.
Health care coverage
This is the big one, and everyone seems to agree that new energy will be
directed toward providing health coverage for all Americans. But some health
care experts predict the winning strategy will be to promote grass roots efforts
to pass state legislation. To pay for extending coverage to the 47 million
uninsured, Democrats may want to revise the income tax exclusion for
employer-provided health coverage. It looks like they have a chance at using the
fed's buying power to negotiate lower prices with drug manufacturers, but
Marilyn Moon, director of the health program at the American Institutes for
Research and a former trustee of the Social Security and Medicare trust
funds says, "This is going to be much more of a morass than people think."
Negotiating drug prices, she says, is "a feel-good kind of answer, but it's not
one that is easy to imagine how you put into practice."
They'll also try to drive down prices by widening the availability of
imported drugs (Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) who will head the House Government
Reform Committee, says reducing the price of prescription drugs is high on his
priority list).
Another suggestion: Letting businesses with up to 100 employees have tax
credits to buy insurance through a government-sponsored pool that will give them
a choice of private health insurance plans.
With Democrats in charge, several experts predict that efforts to improve and
expand health savings accounts will grind to a halt, since many Democrats see
HSAs as a tax break for the wealthy. They may also move to expand the Children's
Health Insurance Program. Others suggest another area where gridlock, in the
form of each party's opposition to the other's health proposals, will intensify.
It may be tough to pass any significant new health reform initiatives.
Offshoring
Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) will become chair of the House Ways and Means
Committee. One of his top priorities will be "ending tax shelters for companies
that move American jobs overseas," said the WSJ two days after the election.
Housing
Barney Frank is expected to push hard for legislation that will require
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to use more of their resources for financing loans to
low-income people.
Education
The Bush Administration wants to continue to focus on improving public
schools through "No Child," and a coalition is pushing for more government
support of Pre-K education. Our hope is that this will be one area that attracts
bipartisan support. They could look to surveys by the Committee for Economic
Development for evidence that business leaders overwhelmingly support
universal Pre-K, saying it would improve the workforce and help U.S. economy in
the long run.
Democrats would like to do more to help Americans pay for college. Nancy
Pelosi's platform calls for making up to $12,000 a year in college tuition
tax-deductible. She also wants to cut interest rates on student loans and
increase the maximum Pell Grant for low-income students to $5,100 from the
current $4,050.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Dow Jones reported on Nov. 21st that lawmakers want to give small and midsize
firms some relief from the strict accounting rules while making large employers
continue to toe the line.
Earlier this year, Reps. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., and Tom Feeney, R-Fla.,
introduced a bill that would free smaller firms from having to comply with the
internal-controls requirements set by Congress in 2002. Meeks now says he wants
to broaden the option to include midsize firms, although he said he hasn't
decided yet where the new cut-off point would be set.
Immigration
The wall is out. The Congress that voted for it in September neglected to
fund it, and the new chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Bennie
Thompson (D-MS) voted against it the first time and is considered an immigration
dove. Top Republicans, including the President, are pro-immigration and support
a guest worker program, but the Boston Globe says even though party leaders
insist that rewriting immigration law remains a priority, they acknowledge that
building consensus on how to do it will be tricky. Some, like Claire McCaskill,
a new Senator from Missouri, are considered hawks, and have been very vocal. In
a September television spot, says the Globe, McCaskill sat at a kitchen table
and looked directly into the camera."Let me tell you what I believe in," she
said. "No amnesty for illegal immigrants."
Business wants to keep the laws as simple as possible, says the HJ Cummins
column, and they're worried about proposals to make employers responsible for
determining the legal status of all their workers. Cummins quotes one labor law
expert, who says, "They don't like to be in the business of being a cop. And
they're trying to educate selectors not to focus on race and ethnicity when
hiring." If the party can come to terms with its conservative element, in this
area, at least, business and Congress might find some common ground.
Whatever happens with the 110th U.S. Congress, it won't begin to look like
business as usual for at least a month or so, and it may make the morning paper
just a touch more interesting.
Susan Seitel
President
WFC Resources
|